Generally speaking, prosthetic joint infections are caused by several different types of bacteria. These include Lactobacillus casei, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and a number of others. Luckily, they are treatable and may be prevented by using a number of methods.

Lactobacillus casei

Several cases of prosthetic joint infections have been reported in the literature, including one case of infection due to Lactobacillus species. These infections are associated with prosthetic failure and revision surgeries. Although they are rare, bacterial seeding of prosthetic joints is a concern for care providers.

There is little information available about the mechanisms of action of Lactobacillus casei and prosthetic joint infection. However, there is some evidence that oral administration of this probiotic can have protective effects against various respiratory infections in children. Moreover, it has been shown that this strain is capable of activating the immature immune system in neonatal and infant mice.

In addition to its probiotic properties, this strain may also have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. It has been shown that this bacterium reduces inflammation, inflammatory cytokines, and oxidative stress. This effect is likely to be associated with its ability to prevent Salmonella enteritidis reactive arthritis. In this study, the titer of the virus in the nasal washings of infant mice was significantly decreased in the L. casei Shirota group, compared with the control group.

In a recent trial, a drink containing L. casei and other probiotics was found to reduce antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. This drink was also helpful in reducing chronic constipation.

These studies are very important in helping to understand the role of Lactobacillus in attenuating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This is especially true considering that RA is a chronic condition that has been associated with increased levels of inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygenated species.

In the present study, Lactobacillus casei was administered orally for 20 weeks. After the intervention, patients showed improvement in RA-related pathophysiological parameters and showed a favourable outcome. The patient was also reevaluated nine months after the intervention and had no sign of recurrence.

Synovial fluid leukocyte count

Typical differential diagnosis of joint diseases involves synovial fluid analysis. However, currently available diagnostic methods are time-consuming and have limited accuracy. New diagnostic approaches are being developed to overcome these limitations.

One example of such a technique is an automated cellular analysis of the synovial fluid. Another is next-generation sequencing. These new techniques offer a fast diagnosis with the advantage of accurate measurements.

Optical microscopic analysis is still considered the reference method for cell analysis in synovial fluid. Optical microscopy has many drawbacks, including long turnaround time, low throughput, and high inter-operator variability.

Previous studies have discussed different thresholds for leukocyte count and differential in synovial fluid. These thresholds vary depending on the type of infection. A common cut-off is between 1.7×109/L and 4.5×109/L. But this is also controversial.

The proportion of neutrophils was found to be significant, especially in patients with prosthetic joint infections. The percentage of PMN in the synovial fluid was comparable to the leukocyte count.

The leukocyte count was higher in patients with prosthetic joint infection than in patients with aseptic failure. The final leukocyte count was 38×109/L, which was compatible with peri-prosthetic infection.

Synovial fluid pH is also studied as a potential diagnostic marker for PJI. This parameter may be useful in differentiating inflammatory joint diseases from normal joints. Its values are lower than those of alkaline solutions. In the future, a larger number of samples should be investigated.

Synovial fluid cultures are standard preoperative investigations for PJI. Although they have limited sensitivity, they have been shown to be accurate. They are based on heat produced by microbial growth in the synovial fluid. The result of the culture should be interpreted in context with the Gram stain result.

Neutrophil percentage

PJI, or prosthetic joint infection, is a devastating complication after total knee or hip arthroplasty. This is a complex diagnosis that poses numerous challenges. It is important to make an accurate diagnosis as early as possible to avoid complications.

The use of clinical criteria and laboratory data in the diagnosis of PJI is essential. Various organizations have proposed guidelines for the workup and treatment of PJI. Nevertheless, these criteria are not yet based on clinical evidence.

In order to determine an appropriate cut-off for a PJI, Morawietz et al conducted a study to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) and synovial fluid white blood cell count (WBC) in patients with painful TJA. They also evaluated the results of CD15 antibodies and histology.

They concluded that the sensitivity of polymorphonuclear neutrophils was high and had good specificity for predicting a prosthetic joint infection. A higher proportion of neutrophils was seen in patients with an infected knee. The proportion of PMN was significantly higher in the infected group than in the noninfected group.

The use of polymorphonuclear leukocytes from periprosthetic tissue may be a better indicator of PJI than the synovial WBC. The optimal cut-off for PJI is approximately 74.6% of the total count.

The sensitivity and specificity of these thresholds were compared to the Infectious Diseases Society of America’s (IDSA) and European Bone and Joint Infection Society’s (EBJIS) criteria. The sensitivity was derived from the z-test and the specificity was from the area under the ROC curve.

These findings suggest that the synovial fluid leukocyte differential of more than 65% is a sensitive test for PJI. This is a much lower cut-off than the infection rate in the native joint.

Imaging studies

PJI is a clinical condition that can develop after joint prostheses are implanted. Bacteria may penetrate the wound during surgery, or the environment around the prosthesis may be devascularized, making it easier for bacteria to establish an infection. Infection and loosening are often similar histopathologically, and the diagnosis between the two can be challenging. However, imaging studies are useful in the diagnosis of PJI.

Conventional radiography is the first imaging tool used to evaluate the diagnosis of THA. This is a diagnostic tool that provides information about the implant and adjacent bony structures. CT uses X-ray and computer technology to produce cross-sectional images. The sensitivity of this test is high, and the accuracy ranges from 84% to 88%.

In addition, there are other non-radiological imaging tests, such as ultrasound, which can be used to assess the presence of periprosthetic fluid collections. This is a cost-effective method that can be performed bedside. In addition, ultrasound can also be used to track sinus tracts within the soft tissue, which helps to differentiate abscesses from aseptic collections.

Labelled leukocyte scintigraphy (LLS) is another method that can be used to diagnose PJI. This method has excellent results, and it has been shown to be more specific than other methods. Although it is not available in routine practice, it has been shown to be highly accurate.

Other imaging techniques include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). MRI can show hyperintense synovitis, while CT can provide detailed cross-sectional images of the bone. MRI is useful for detecting bone destruction, while CT is more accurate for the detection of oedema. The optimized VAT MRI method is sensitive for both soft tissue mass and fistula and demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy.

Adverse events

During prosthetic joint infection therapy, a variety of adverse events (AEs) can occur. They can result in reduced function and reduced quality of life. Some of the most common AEs include infection, dislocation, and fracture. These adverse events can be devastating.

A five-year retrospective study was conducted to assess the rate of SAEs in patients treated for hip or knee prosthetic joint infection. Data were collected from three hospitals in southwestern France. In total, 41 patients were evaluated. Using HES APC records, patients were identified as being at risk of AEs after a total hip replacement (THR) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Several study-specific questionnaires were used to evaluate AEs. They asked participants about the diagnosis of their infection, their fracture around the THR, and their overall quality of life. In addition, a computed tomography (CT) scan was performed to examine the infected area. This scan produced detailed cross-sectional images of the bone and tissue.

Infection was the most common AE. Nine patients experienced two or more SAEs. Most infections were superficial wound infections, with only 11 of the confirmed infections being deep prosthetic infections. The microbiology of the prosthetic joint affected the outcome of the infection. The most common bacterial species involved in prosthetic joint infections were coagulase-negative staphylococci. These bacteria can wait until the immune system is compromised. They can then attack a vulnerable spot and grow.

Other AEs included bacteremia, sinus tract infection, and local abscess. All outcomes improved with time. Only three SAEs were linked to vein catheters. These results suggest that a blood culture should be performed before antibiotics are given.

Although these results indicate that patients treated for prosthetic joint infection are at increased risk of severe AEs, further research is needed to determine the psychosocial impact of these adverse events.

More on Prosthetic Joint Infection – PMC (nih.gov)

Categorized in: